Banner: SAFEGROUNDS Learning Network - a network managed by CIRIA

home > current consultations > record keeping consultation

Consultation on SAFEGROUNDS Good Practice Guidance for Records and Record Keeping

Introduction

You are invited to review and comment on the third draft of the developing guidance for records and record-keeping. This draft is an advanced full draft of the guidance. The project to produce this is strongly supported by the SAFEGROUNDS steering group and funded by the NDA along with a contribution from Defence Estates. Background information and instructions on how to provide comments are given below.

Background

Members of the SAFEGROUNDS Learning Network have requested that good practice guidance be developed on records and record-keeping for contaminated land and land quality, which addresses the knowledge requirements of nuclear and defence sites and their related stakeholders. In particular members have requested that guidance be developed to address the adequacy of:

The guidance is aimed at organisations responsible for the management of contaminated land, but will also inform other interested stakeholders. It aims to present principles and a recommended approach for contaminated land records and record-keeping that are broadly applicable and that could be used for other types of site and topic areas.

Description of the consultation process

The record-keeping guidance is being developed using the SAFEGROUNDS document consultation process, which sets out the key stages of guidance development and consultation. In line with this process, the development of the record-keeping guidance will be opened up at various stages for steering group and wider consultation through this website. These stages, including detail of who is to be consulted and when, are summarised below:

 

Stage of guidance production

Consultees

Timing

Status

1

Project specification

steering group

Nov 05 – Jan 06

complete

2

Draft 1 – outline structure and contents list

steering group

May 06

complete

3

Draft 2 – first full draft

steering group + wider

Jul – Aug 06

complete

4

Draft 3 – advanced full draft

steering group + wider

Oct 06

current

5

Draft 4 – final draft

steering group

Nov 06

 

6

Draft 5 – edited publication for website

n/a

Dec 06

 

 

Stakeholders can follow the development of drafts of the guidance (including the logs of the comments submitted at each stage of guidance development) in the project consultation log.

 

Instructions on how to provide your comments on Draft 3.1

(Issued 09/10/06, reissued 18/10/06)

You are invited to review and comment on Draft 3.1 of the developing guidance for records and record-keeping. This draft is an advanced full draft of the guidance.

How to give your comments: 1) download draft 3.1 using the link below, 2) use the submission form below to enter your comments and 3) track the document's progress using the project consultation log.

Draft 3.1 – advanced full draft (Adobe acrobat format)
Comments submission form (Word document)
Project consultation log

All comments should be returned via email to jo.facer@ciria.org, by 12.00 on Friday 27th October 2006 (extended for RWPG members to 15 Dec 06)

On receipt of your comments, CIRIA will:

  • Notify you of receipt of the comments
  • Log the comments*
  • Pass the logged comments on to a technical consultant for consideration.
  • The technical consultant will then review the comments and take appropriate action**
  • The logged comments and actions will be posted in the project log (comments will not be attributed).

*If you do not wish your comment to be interpreted in any way as part of the development of the next draft of the guidance (i.e. you would like the comment wording to be logged and included verbatim) then please make this clear by including the phrase ‘(include verbatim)’.

**Where it was not deemed appropriate to amend the report in response to a comment, the comment will be logged along with a note from the technical consultant’s where appropriate. No comments will be ignored. If any conflicts arise, the technical consultant will request, via CIRIA, assistance from the steering group. The steering group will look at a minimum to accurately record any minority views.

sitemap