home > documents > safegrounds document > radiation risks paper
Perspectives on the health risks from low levels of ionising radiation - David Collier, 2011
Individual viewpoint papers:
(Adobe acrobat format)
SAFEGROUNDS documents generally represent consensus guidance on best practice on the management of radioactively and chemically contaminated land on nuclear and defence sites in the UK. However, SAFEGROUNDS is not a scientific committee, but it is a forum where individual stakeholders express their views and opinions, thus agreement may not be reached on every topic. The aim is to build consensus around common needs and concerns but no one stakeholders’ views take precedence over others’ legitimate needs or concerns in the process, provided that the process has been properly conducted.
Where consensus cannot be achieved, the role of SAFEGROUNDS is to raise awareness of the differences of view and encourage resolution through appropriate channels rather than make its own judgements. One of the topics is the health risks from low levels of ionising radiation and so SAFEGROUNDS invited four authors to contribute debate papers for publication on the website as part of the awareness raising process.
Unlike SAFEGROUNDS guidance documents, the purpose of these four debate papers is to explore differences in view rather than areas of agreement. They are not intended as consensus papers, and have not been endorsed by the Steering Group. In each case individual members may well disagree with some of their contents.
The first three debate papers were independently written by members of the SAFEGROUNDS Project Steering Group. Although there are naturally conflicts between papers, each can be taken as fully representing the views of the authors’ organisation. Please click on the links below to access the papers:
This fourth paper was written by David Collier, an independent consultant. Its purpose is to offer a framework for understanding different perspectives on the potential impact on human health of levels of ionising radiation below current regulatory limits. It attempts to summarise the key points from the three position papers and the main differences in perspective, but is not a substitute for them. SAFEGROUNDS encourages all those seeking an understanding to also read the source documents, which are concise and written to be accessible to a wide audience, and are supported by detailed references to the literature.
Although drafts of this paper were reviewed by the other debate paper authors to help ensure the positions being expressed had been properly understood, the subsequent analysis of the competing arguments is that of the author alone. It was commissioned by CIRIA (SAFEGROUNDS managers) but should not be taken as representing the views of CIRIA or any SAFEGROUNDS member organisation.
It was also the author’s decision to set the issues out side by side without commenting explicitly or implicitly on their validity, on the basis that it is a guide to the arguments and not an assessment of them. This approach has value but means that consensus support for the publication of the paper from all sides of the debate could not be obtained. CIRIA recommends reading the comments from the other three debate paper authors on the remaining areas of disagreement (see page 6 of the document) before reading the rest of the document.
Perspectives on the health risks from low levels of ionising radiation - David Collier, 2011
Individual viewpoint papers:
(All adobe acrobat format)
 |
This website is managed and maintained by CIRIA |